Search portmangroup.org.uk

Close

Can of beer, a silver can with a colourful drawing of an apartment block with faces and legs coming out of the sides in blues and reds.

A complaint against Lervig’s House Party IPA has not been upheld by the alcohol industry’s Independent Complaints Panel (ICP), the full decision can be read here.

The complaint, made by Zenith Global Commercial Ltd, as part of the Portman Group’s independent proactive audit of the UK market[1], raised concerns under Code Rule 3.2(h), whereby a drink, its packaging and any promotional material or activity should not in any direct or indirect way have a particular appeal to under-18s.

After a provisional decision by the Panel to uphold the complaint, the producer appealed on the grounds that the name House Party did not create an automatic association with under-18s, that the packaging did not include the normal touchstones of youth marketing, and that the phrase ‘house party’ appeared in countless adult contexts. The design was intentionally abstract and did not include any of the fonts or imagery that would normally appeal to under-18s.

The Panel acknowledged that the name ‘House Party’, alongside an abstract depiction of a chaotic and wild house party, would have a certain amount of appeal to a teenage age group but agreed that the concept would also strongly resonate with a younger adult demographic.  This, alongside an abstract, stylised design with a limited colour palette with a simplistic font, meant the Panel concluded that the packaging did not have a particular appeal to under-18s.  Accordingly, the Panel did not uphold the complaint under Code rule 3.2(h).

Chair of the Independent Complaints Panel, Rachel Childs, said: “It is very unusual that the Panel overturn a provisional decision, however, this case shows the benefits of producers engaging with the complaints process and with the Panel. This also shows the importance of our two-step process in ensuring we have considered and fully discussed all factors before making a full and final decision.”

[1] Part of the independent proactive audit of the Naming and Packaging of Alcoholic Drinks Code, Sixth Edition Amended